As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Best for enthusiasts

Gaggia Classic Pro Review

By the CremaCompare team · Updated

A long-running Italian design with a commercial-size portafilter and a huge community of owners and upgrade parts.

This page contains affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more

Gaggia Classic Pro (RI9380)
Best for: Hobbyists who want a durable, upgradeable machine
Buy on Amazon

Key specs

Width × depth × height23 × 24 × 38 cm (9.1 × 9.4 × 15.0 in)
Weight8 kg (18 lb)
Water tank2.1 L (71 oz)
TypeSemi-automatic (no grinder)
Built-in grinderNo
Milk frothingCommercial-style steam wand
Portafilter58 mm (commercial standard)
Price tierMid-range (see Amazon for today's price)

Specs are from the manufacturer. Always confirm on the Amazon listing before buying, including that it is a 120 V US model.

Plugs and voltage in your country →

Pros

  • 58 mm commercial portafilter accepts pro accessories
  • Solid steel build
  • Easy to repair and modify

Cons

  • No grinder, and it needs a good one
  • Temperature takes practice to manage
  • Fewer beginner-friendly features

Overview

The Classic Pro has stayed close to the same design for decades, which is why there are so many guides, spare parts and upgrades for it. Its 58 mm portafilter is the same size used on commercial café machines.

It rewards practice. Many owners 'temperature surf' by running a little water before a shot, and some later add upgrades such as a PID controller.

Who should skip it

You want a machine that does the thinking for you, or you do not want to buy a separate espresso grinder.

What else you will need

🎬 Video guides

Videos by the maker or independent creators on YouTube. They load only when you tap play.

How to use it

Gaggia Classic Pro: Initial Setup and First Use · GaggiaNA

Verdict

Buy it if you see espresso as a hobby. Skip it if you want push-button convenience.

Check today's price on Amazon

Alternatives to consider

Related buying guides

See the full comparison table →

↑